Burriin Risk SystemsBURRIINRISK SYSTEMS
About & Method

Burriin means shield.

A Kamilaroi word, carried into a risk framework built to protect the people mainstream systems were never designed to see.

The Method

The Burriin Workplace Systems Framework

The Burriin Workplace Systems Framework is the methodology that underpins every engagement we deliver. It was developed to solve one problem: organisations can’t control psychosocial hazards they never identify.

Burriin was built on a simple idea. Most organisations don’t have a control problem. They have a visibility problem.

You can’t control a hazard you haven’t identified. You can’t identify a hazard your consultation process hasn’t surfaced. And you can’t improve outcomes your measurement systems can’t see.

The framework doesn’t replace the systems you already have, it extends them, adding the visibility layer most psychosocial risk processes assume already exists. It’s designed to strengthen compliance with contemporary psychosocial health and safety obligations while improving the quality of organisational consultation.

01

Governance

Clear organisational commitment and accountability for psychosocial risk, set from the top.

02

Visibility

Visible

Structured identification of hazards, including the sixteen standard hazards and the five First Nations hazards our model adds.

03

Action

Controllable

Controls, responsibilities and evidence are built from the hazards actually identified, creating a defensible system rather than a generic action plan.

04

Impact

Defensible

Evidence of what changed, feeding back into governance so the system keeps improving rather than resetting each year.

Every stage generates evidence that demonstrates how psychosocial risks were identified, assessed, controlled and reviewed. Each stage feeds the next, and the evidence from Impact feeds back into Governance, so the system keeps improving rather than resetting every year.

How We Work

Visibility starts with trust

Policies tell you what an organisation expects. Consultation tells you what people actually experience. The gap between those two is often where psychosocial risk lives.

That gap runs wider again for First Nations employees. Cultural responsibility, community connection and identity are not psychosocial hazards in themselves. They become risks when workplace systems fail to recognise, support or account for them.

Genuine consultation depends on trust, and trust runs in both directions. First Nations workers need to feel safe raising what they experience. The people asking the questions, often not First Nations themselves, need to feel equipped to ask them properly. Burriin’s approach is built around that principle: invite, don’t interpret. Consultations are conducted confidentially, because that’s what produces honest answers, not a name attached to a disclosure.

Mob Supporting Mob

Burriin operates under Mob Supporting Mob principles across all of its work. First Nations businesses, community organisations, and ACCOs are engaged on terms that reflect community relationships, not just commercial ones.

Jarrod McKenzie, Founder of Burriin Risk Systems
Founder

Built on lived experience and two decades in corporate leadership

Burriin Risk Systems was founded by Jarrod McKenzie, a Kamilaroi man from Moree, NSW, after recognising that many psychosocial risk systems were technically compliant, yet still failed to identify the workplace experiences many First Nations workers were carrying.

Before founding Burriin, Jarrod spent over 20 years in senior corporate leadership roles across the Asia-Pacific region and Africa.

That combination, a cultural lens, a compliance framework, and two decades of systems thinking, is rare. It’s intentional: it’s what lets Burriin build a methodology that holds up under both cultural and regulatory scrutiny.

Jarrod is also Vice President at Life Skills Victoria, and Burriin is a Supply Nation registered and Kinaway Chamber of Commerce member business.

See the method applied

The framework isn’t theory. It’s how Burriin helps organisations identify what standard consultation often misses, then build the evidence that those risks are being managed.